The introduction to the final vision in chapter 10 did more than just portray an impressive angelic visitation. It provided verbal links to the vision of the โRam and the Goatโ and its interpretation. Now, additional details are presented concerning the demise of Persia, the rise of Greece and its first great king, and its division into four lesser realms.
Continue reading “Persia Stirs Greece”Category: Greece
Final Vision – Introduction
The tenth chapter of Daniel introduces the final vision received from one with the โappearance of a man.โ The vision is described in detail in chapter 11, and it includes verbal links to the bookโs preceding visions. It begins by expanding on the vision of the โGoatโ with a โprominent hornโ that overthrew the โRamโ and the division of the Greek empire into four โlesser kingdoms.โ
Continue reading “Final Vision – Introduction”King of Fierce Countenance
Next, Daniel receives the interpretation of his vision of the โram and goat.โ In chapter 7, only the first โbeastโ can be identified with certainty โ Babylon. In contrast, in the interpretation in chapter 8, two of the four kingdoms are identified by name, the kingdom of the โMedes and Persiansโ and โGreece.โ
Continue reading “King of Fierce Countenance”The Bear and the Leopard
In his vision, Daniel saw โfour beasts ascendingโ from the sea. The first three featured characteristics from the animal kingdom – the winged lion, the bear, and the leopard with two pairs of wings. The fourth beast did not resemble any known species of animal.
The fourth beast was a horrifying monstrosity with โgreat iron teeth,โ โten horns,โ and another โlittle horn, with a mouth speaking great things.โ
Continue reading “The Bear and the Leopard”TWO “LITTLE HORNS”?
The โlittle hornโ is named in two visions. Is it the same figure in each case, or two different individuals? – Daniel 7:7-8, 8:9-14.
The figure called the โlittle hornโ figures prominently in Danielโs visions, and it is explicitly named in the vision of the โfourth beastโ and that of the โram and goat.โ It is reasonable to assume both visions refer to the same figure. The historical references in the first vision are enigmatic, in the second, they are explicit. The careful comparison of parallels between the two visions is vital.
Continue reading “TWO “LITTLE HORNS”?”