Interpreting Revelation, Seventy Weeks

The Missing 70 Weeks

The book of Revelation never refers to the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ prophecy in Daniel, directly or indirectly, a passage in the Hebrew Bible that is foundational to the chronologies and expectations of many interpretations of Revelation, a rather striking omission.

Yet several passages in Revelation are connected to the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ in popular interpretations, and often, it is the basis for last days chronologies and event sequences. For example:

  • โ€œNo portion of the Old Testament scripture is as essential to unlocking the mysteries of the prophetic plan for Godโ€™s future program for Israel and the nations than the book of Daniel and, of all Danielโ€™s prophecies, the prophecy of the Seventy Weeks provides the indispensable chronological key to New Testament prophecyโ€ (from The Seventy Weeks of Daniel by Randall Price).
  • โ€œThe prophet Daniel gave the framework of the Tribulation era in Daniel 9:24-27โ€ (Hal Lindsey,ย Vanished Into Thin Airย [Beverly Hills:ย ย Western Front, 1999], p. 210).

To reiterate, not a single citation from or verbal allusion to the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ is found in Revelation, although the book utilizes several other passages from Daniel, and in some cases, multiple times – (e.g., Daniel 7:21 in Revelation 11:7, 12:17 and 13:7).

If understanding the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ is vital to a correct understanding of Bible prophecy, why is this critical prophetic passage missing from Revelation?

John is certainly familiar with the book of Daniel as his frequent allusions demonstrate, and he almost certainly knows the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ prophecy, yet he never uses it in his book.

For example, Danielโ€™s request to the prince of the eunuchs to โ€œprove us ten daysโ€ is applied to the church at Smyrna. It will know โ€œtribulation for ten days,โ€ just as the Jewish exiles were tested for ten days on a diet that excluded foods offered to idols – (Daniel 1:12-14, Revelation 2:8-11).

Yahweh showed King Nebuchadnezzar โ€œwhat things must come to pass in later days,โ€ a phrase found four times in Revelation to mark the start of literary sections – (Daniel 2:20-28, Revelation 1:1-3).

In Daniel, the vision of the four beasts culminates with the โ€œsaints possessing the kingdom forever.โ€ In Revelation, the โ€œfour beastsโ€ become one beast that ascends from the sea. As in Daniel, this โ€œbeastโ€ wages war against the โ€œsaintsโ€ and prevails over them – (Daniel 7:1-22, Revelation 13:1-10).

The examples can be multiplied. John was well-versed with Daniel and did not hesitate to apply key passages from it. In fact, Revelation utilizes language from every chapter of Daniel EXCEPT the ninth chapter and its โ€œseventy weeksโ€ prophecy. This omission speaks volumes. It seems the prophecy is not integral to the events portrayed in Revelation.

Furthermore, Revelation does not simply restate prophecies from Daniel; instead, it reinterprets and reapplies them. For example, the โ€œseason, seasons and divided seasonโ€ from Daniel becomes โ€œforty-two monthsโ€ and โ€œa thousand two hundred sixty days.โ€ The โ€œlater daysโ€ and โ€œseason of the endโ€ are changed to โ€œsoonโ€ and โ€œat hand.โ€ And so on – (Revelation 11:2-3, 13:5).

Thus, Revelation reinterprets prophetic pictures from Daniel and applies them in new ways. However, it never uses the language or imagery from the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ prophecy, modified or not.

The omission of this important prophecy in Revelation should caution us not to read our assumptions about the โ€œseventy weeksโ€ prophecy into the visions of Revelation.

[Download PDF copy from Google Drive]

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.